Wednesday, April 5, 2017

What BLM is really about

Let's get one thing straight. 

BLM isn't really about white cops killing innocent blacks. 

Indeed, instances of white cops killing blacks is no worse now than in the past. 

It's just that blacks got desperate over the years as they were being crowded out by homos, massive immigration, gentrification, mass incarceration, increased racial profiling(in NY esp), and New Liberalism that favors the 1% over everyone else. 

With Obama winning presidency, many blacks thought 'we got it made'.  But Obama's presidency, while tossing some crumbs at blacks, has been mostly about Wars for Israel(against Russia, Libya, Syria, etc), homomania, white/Jewish/Asian yuppie gentrification, mass immigration(mostly of Mexicans, Asians, and Muslims), bailouts for Wall Street, and etc. 

Blacks are especially pissed because all of this happened when US has come under the dominance of Democrats. When the very people who say the most flowery things about blacks actually push policies that do little for blacks(or even hurt blacks), blacks are awful frustrated. 

But black rage has been muffled because most blacks are Democrats and because the Democratic Party(that dominates all big cities) is supposed to be watching their backs.  

Blacks needed some convenient excuse to vent their spleen, and it was the Narrative of white cops killing innocent blacks. 

But when we see the trajectory of BLM, there is something more happening. If blacks are indeed angry about white police violence, why don't they target the specific police departments where it happened? Why do they march in every city, especially those dominated by white/Jewish/homo Liberals?   
White cops are just scapegoats in all this.  They are useful scapegoats by both BLM and white/Jewish/homo Liberal Establishment.  This is really a struggle between blacks and white/Jewish/homo urban Liberals(who supported increased policing to make cities livable again).  Blacks are really angry at urban Liberals but can't say so cuz they are both Democrats. Urban Liberals are really afraid of blacks but can't say so cuz they are both Democrats. So, blacks pretend they are marching against police brutality, and urban Liberals play along since the alternative --- black rage at Urban Liberal elites --- would be more frightening. 

It reminds me of the scene in Akira Kurosawa's RAN when the Third Castle is being attacked. Though the armies of the two treacherous sons are ostensibly united and working together against the fallen Old Lord, the real power struggle is between the two sons. Theirs is a sham unity held together in the attack against the deposed lord. It's alliance based on deception. The two sides are really eyeing each other for dominance but pretending to direct their full fury at the powerless lord. 



There is no Conservative power in the big cities and college campuses where most of BLM fury is directed.  They are all bastions of Liberal Democratic Power.  But officially, blacks and white/Jewish/homo elites ares supposed to be allies. So, they make 'common cause' and chant the same slogans and make believe that they are united against 'evil racist white cops', but the real rage of BLM is about blacks fuming over how the Liberal Victory Pie went mostly to white yuppies, Jewish elites, homo neo-aristocrats, Asian immigrants, and etc. 

So, this stuff about 'white racist cops' is just a ruse to light the fuse.  Blacks have been looking for some compelling excuse to take to the streets and demand their slice of the pie.  If big cities were dominated by 'racist' Republicans, blacks would have a handy excuse. But blacks had trouble coming up with an excuse since big cities and college towns have been totally taken over by Jews, white Liberals, fancy mulattoes, homos, and diversity-immigrants who are supposed to be Democratic allies of blacks.  Besides, US has a black Democratic president. So, blacks just fumed silently while losing out to other groups within the Liberal coalition. 

But with BLM, blacks finally latched onto some 'compelling' issue to retake center stage of the Liberal Narrative. They bitch about cops, but it's about something much more.  The real message is "WE BLACKS ARE ANGRY AS HELL FOR BEING SENT TO THE BACK OF THE LIBERAL BUS, AND WE WANT SOMETHING NOW OR WE WILL USE 'RACIST COP' ISSUE AS EXCUSE TO BURN DOWN CITIES WHERE YOU JEWS, WHITE LIBS, HOMOS, AND IMMIGRANTS HAVE IT SO GOOD."

It's like Spike Lee's screed about how Urban Liberals are 'bogarting' the neighborhood he grew up in. 

In a way, the Liberal Establishment miscalculated. It figured that it could control and contain black rage by flattering some black activists, thus buying them off.  
Some argue that Obama made things worse by inflaming black rage, but this is only a half-truth.  Obama's variation of  "I feel your pain" to the black community was really to contain the rage.  By pretending to do something about black rage, Obama may have encouraged black violence but he also appropriated black rage into institutional hands. Eric Holder was criticized for poring over every detail in Ferguson, but it had a way of calming things down a bit. It created the impression that the government was fully invested in the issue. And Baltimore calmed down when the cops were charged with the murder of Freddie Grey. Trust the officials and don't burn down cities.

Such gambits are effective but unstable.  They may calm down the black community by sending the message that something is being done. But it also sends the message that LOUDER BLACKS ACT, MORE ATTENTION THEY GET. 

And so, we ended up with BLM that is spreading to other nations as well, like Canada and UK and Germany, and etc.  

No comments:

Post a Comment