“Pillar one supporting that edifice: ideology. As long as most Americans accept the notion that it is the God-given mission and right of the United States to go anywhere on the planet and do more or less anything it cares to do with its military, you won’t see Pentagon spending brought under real control. Think of this as the military corollary to American exceptionalism — or just call it the doctrine of armed exceptionalism, if you will.”
But is this part of the American DNA?
Is it part of the American DNA to dominate, transform, and convert the entire world with missionary zeal?
The Founding Fathers warned against US involvement in overseas affairs. To be sure, Americans were too occupied with settling a vast wilderness to dream of overseas empire.
Still, the political philosophy of America was not about an ‘exceptional’ right to go all over the world and flex its muscles.
In many ways, American political philosophy was ‘isolationist’, not because US was so vast. It was like a world unto itself. Even without the rest of the world, Americans had a huge world of their own to themselves.
Americans were not keen on getting involved in WWI. And after the war, America drastically cut military spending and downsized the military: one of the reasons why Japan thought it could take on America. And the great majority of Americans didn’t want to get involved in WWII. It was only Japanese attack that roused Americans for entry.
And Americans were confused about Asian policy. Should America save China after WWII? Or just let it fall to communists? Should US involve itself in Korea? Or just move out? Initially, US decided to leave Korea and let the North have the South. But then, it changed its mind.
Also, the Cold War was mostly defensive. While US did prop up its allies around the world, it was not the case that Americanism was aggressively knocking on the door of every nation. Maybe with Coca Cola and Pop Culture. But politically, US lived in fear of spread of communism, not least because so many Third World nations had been former colonies of Europeans and took inspiration from Soviets, Mao, Ho Chi Minh, and later Castro and Che.
While not all national liberation struggles were communist, many looked to Soviets for support. Some turned to China for support. If Africa and Asia had been European colonies, things were trickier in Latin America, a US backyard along the Monroe Doctrine. Yet, Latin America was a most strange case because it had double layer of imperialism: Latin Imperialism over natives and mestizos(and blacks in some parts), and Gringo Imperialism over Latin imperialism over natives and mestizos. This meant native/mestizo resentment toward white Latin elites. But it also meant Latin white resentment at the Yanqui or Gringo.
Some Latin whites collaborated with Yanqui who favored right-wing Latin elites over mestizos and natives who might rise up like the colonized in Africa, Asia, and Middle East. But some Latin whites decided to lead the natives and mestizos against both Latin elites and Yanquis. Pinochet or Che.
Because of post-colonial themes, US didn’t fight the Cold War aggressively but defensively. The question was not turning communist nations into capitalist ones but defending as many nations(esp non-white ones) as possible from turning communist or pro-Soviet.
So, even as the Cold War led to huge American expenditures, its theme was not about American Exceptionalism and spreading the American Way to other nations.
In both Korea and Vietnam, US struggled to prop up its client states against determined enemies who sought to unify the nations. And US failed with Bay of Pigs in Cuba and didn’t try again. And US shat bricks about Marxism spreading like wildfire all over Latin America. And US was upset that India, though not communist, was allied with the USSR.
Periods of American ‘exceptionalist’ jingoist-crusade had been rather limited. It only took off with the end of the Cold War.
The first bout of US globalist imperialism was when Americans had finished the settling of the American West and looked elsewhere for booty. And they saw an easy target in the rotting corpse of Spanish Empire. Taking Cuba, Puerto Rico, and Philippines was a cinch since the Spain was the dying man of Europe. As for the Monroe Doctrine that’s been around, it wasn’t about American messianism in Latin America. America more or less accepted Latin America for what it was after it gained liberation from Spain under Simon Bolivar. America was content merely to have military superiority over it. US had no designs to transform it.
Such missionary zeal was aimed really at Hawaii and Philippines. But they were pushovers, though Filipinos put up some resistance that led to bloodbath.
At any rate, near the turn of the century, US wasn’t looking to conquer the world, control the world, and etc. US took it for granted that European powers would rule much of the world: the Brits and French mostly but there were also Germans, Dutch, and others. US would go for easy picking like Hawaii, Philippines, and Cuba. And it would go for accommodation in China which would be cut like a cake among the various big powers, Japan included.
So, the US wasn’t looking for too much. It had reasons to be content cuz its own nation, along with Alaska, was so huge. What need to control the world when US itself is a world unto itself?
US messianism really came into being AFTER the Cold War. And to understand this, we need to understand the nature of Jewish Political Psychology(along with that of homos).
When US emerged as the top power after WWI, it could have played for supreme power in the world or at least a model beacon to the world. And to be sure, Wilson did try to propose the American Way to the world. But did Wilson really mean it? No. He was really talking about democratizing parts of Europe. He didn’t much care for the non-whites whom he saw as backward and inferior.
Also, the fact that US soon lost interest in Europe and turned inward goes to show that the American DNA was not infected with messianism and ‘exceptionalist’ world domination. If anything, many Americans began to feel that US involvement in WWI was a big mistake. US cut down its military and lost interest in much of the world. It didn’t care what was happening elsewhere. And Americans had to be dragged into WWII via Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor.
One could say FDR was the first truly globe-shifting American. He wasn’t content to defeat Germany and Japan in WWII but pressured Europeans to let go of their empires after WWII. He didn’t like Churchill’s jokes about the Hindu darkies. But was FDR being idealistic or was he imbued with global ambition in which America would become the new hegemon along with the USSR, for which he had a soft spot.
Did he want Europeans to drop the empire so US could pick them up? Or did he just want non-white peoples to develop their own nations and have good relations with US whose intentions would NOT be imperialist and exploitative? I dunno. At any rate, it appears FDR wasn’t interested in dominating the world or have US be the sole superpower.
And then, the Cold War mostly had US shitting bricks playing a defensive role. The problem wasn’t only containing communism but preventing the alliance of non-communist non-white nations(rich with natural resources and populations) with the USSR, as happened with India and Egypt(before Sadat switched alliances).
Anyway, the kind of ‘exceptionalism’ that became the globo-neo-imperialism really only took hold after the Cold War. And we have to consider the Jewish Factor in this. Indeed, Jews were the great exceptionalists even during the Cold War.
American Policy during the Cold War was to accommodate the non-white peoples(even supporting them against former European colonizers) so that they would lean toward the US than to the USSR. And US could have done this in the Middle East and North Africa. As US had more to offer in terms of aid, all those nations should have leaned to the US than to the USSR. But why did some key Arab nations turn to USSR? Because of Israel. From the viewpoint of foreign policy, US support of Israel made no sense.
Why sacrifice alliance with key major Arab nations by supporting a small state of Israel that was NO strategic importance to the US? It was because Jews had great power in the US and were in the process of turning the Holocaust into a religion that had to be worshiped. The real McCarthyism of American Politics has been the witch-hunt for anyone who is not 100% committed to Israel and Holocaust as religion.
Jewish interests became an exceptionalist factor in America no matter how irrational they were.
American attitude after WWI goes to show that Americans were generally content to operate within the national model. And Americans might have done the same thing after WWII. It was the Cold War that forced Americans to become involved. Actually, not just the Cold War but the collapse of the European Colonial Order. IF the only two nations left in the world after WWII were US and USSR, US might have just ignored the commie USSR and went about its way. But the fall of the colonial order meant the possibility of the Third World lurching to the commie side. Unless US stepped into the fray of the Cold War, much of Asia, Africa, and Middle East could turn communist. And then the majority mestizos and natives of Latin America might rise too, either led by Latin leaders or by native/mestizos. And of course, US had to defend Western Europe too.
Anyway, when US saw China fall to the communists in no time, it began to shit. Just how did that happen? Maybe FDR invited Soviets cuz he wanted the commies to win. I dunno. Or maybe he underestimated the impact. It’s hard to discern what he really wanted cuz he was a devious man yet not without genuine ideals. Whatever the case, US fought the Cold War in the mode of Damage Control and to stop the bleeding, not to spread American domination all over the world. The main theme was “Don’t join the Soviets” than “Join us”.
But one thing for sure, after the Cold War, there really was no reason for US to get overly involved with the world. It could just trade with other nations, and that was it. Communism was dead. Even Latin American guerrillas pretty much gave it up.
North Vietnam may have won the war, but US won the peace, as Asian nations allied with the US made the real achievement in economy, politics, and health.
Russia ended the communist party and was ready to do business. The fall of the Berlin Wall earlier was epic. Soviets were willing to let its former subject nations go. Amazingly, the Russians went further and dismantled even the USSR itself. Russia gave up huge swaths of territory, especially Kazaksstan and even Ukraine, culturally so close to Russia. And with no more Soviet support, Third World Marxist insurgencies were totally dead.
So, why didn’t America do what it did after WWI? Just mind its own business?
When WWII ended, the Cold War loomed. But when the Cold War ended, the global war was really over. There was no more need for more mega-conflicts. Francis Fuku was right on this.
But what Fuku failed to understand is that civilizations are not only ideological. They can be ethnological. If Anglo-Americans had firm control of the US after the Cold War, maybe things might have been different. But the so-called End of History also brought about the End of Anglo rule and rise of Jewish rule. And that changed everything.
When WWI ended, Anglo-Americans and other white Americans could just turn inward and be happy as Americans. They could accept the national model.
But Jews have always been uneasy with the gentile national model. It would mean gentile majority against Jewish minority. So, Jews feel safer playing with the globalist model. It weakens the national identity and loyalty within gentile nations. It turns white elites away from white masses(the coming apart) and makes them identify with the World as ‘global citizens’ and the source of masses of new immigrants. Globalism could undermine gentile unity in every nation. This is why Jews hate Viktor Orban in Hungary and the angry patriotic Poles. And of course, they hate Russian’s neo-nationalism that united Putin and other Russian elites with Russian masses. This has thwarted the Jewish takeover of Russia. Russia is friendly to Jews, but that isn’t enough. Jews feel that unless majority gentile power is totally destroyed, they won’t be safe as supremacist overlords. Jews have strange dreams of naked Trumps and Putins coming after them with Nazi armbands and SS dildos to shove up their arses.
So, after the Cold War, Jews pushed US into a globalist mode. They cooked up this notion of ‘proposition nation’ and ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’ nation that must involve itself with the rest of the world(usually for the sake of Zionist interests, which is why most of US wars have been in the Middle East and North Africa and other Muslim nations than elsewhere). What has happened to the US as the result of Jewish takeover since the end of the Cold War is sickening. So much of US aggression and justification thereof around the world are fantastic, gratuitous, surreal, ludicrous, and etc. Since Jews cannot say they are steering US policy for their own tribal interest, they cook up all sorts of crazy stuff. Jews even use homos as their proxy. I mean the idea of a ‘new cold war’ with Russia because homos are not allowed to prance around on Red Square. I mean who would have thought such a day would have been possible during the real Cold War? Even Mad Magazine would have passed it over as loony even for humor.
What is so exasperating about Jews is they mask their supremacism with struggle against ‘white supremacism’. Take the Jewish hostility against Donald Trump. Trump isn’t anti-Jewish or anti-Israel. He is calling for civic nationalism. Too many Americans haven fallen behind, and American workers need something too after globalists and upper crust have been devouring most of the economic pie. Also, too much money has been spent on overseas wars and too many American soldiers have come back wounded or worse. So, let’s intervene less, let’s have good relations with Russia, and let’s offer something for the American Worker and blacks too(who also must compete with immigrants, though, to be sure, maybe some blacks want immigrants to work, pay taxes, and support the government that supports them).
Trump’s ‘America First’ means America should go into national mode and take care of its own citizens first. There is nothing supremacist about it. Also, Trump’s policies would be better for Muslims and Arabs since fewer US wars will lead to fewer destruction of Arab/Muslim nations.
But Trump is seen as Hitler by so many Jews. Of course, Jews know he is NOT Hitler. So, why are Jews so upset? It’s because Trump’s civic nationalism gets in the way of Jewish Hitlerism or Jewish supremacism. Fewer wars in the Middle East means less chance for Zionists to destroy Arab/Muslim nations for the sake of Israel.
And if Americans go into national mode and try to do things that are good for American people as a whole, there might be more scrutiny into Wall Street and other such institutions. Rich Jews would have to be more mindful of doing things that are good for all Americans instead of just themselves.
End to mass immigration means American elites, Jews or otherwise, must be more responsive and accountable to American citizens. In contrast, more immigration means they can renege on such duty. How? They can exploit the immigrant labor that is willing work like slaves out of gratitude of having been allowed to come here. Also, as the elites praise the immigrants as the ‘true Americans’, native-born Americans will have to take a backseat. If native-born Americans complain, the elites can show off their ‘moral credentials’ as the champions of ‘diversity’ and the ‘huddled masses’, especially against ‘ugly’ nativism and ‘xenophobia’. This way, Jewish supremacism is protected.
Also, globalism means the US keeps finding new enemies around the world. By directing American rage at Russia or Iran or whatever, dumb Americans pay less far less attention to their real problems at home under the heel of globalist elites.
America in National Mode means most Americans will pay attention to domestic affairs and call out on elite abuse or corruption. But America in global mode means the elites can divert American attention from domestic abuse and corruption to Evil Foreigners. It is surreal that Jews who accuse patriots of ‘xenophobia’ have no qualms about fanning hatred against certain other nations. So, never mind what the Wikileaks say about the massive amount of domestic corruption and collusion. Just remember that Russia and Putin are behind it, and Trump is their ‘puppet’. Jewish supremacist oligarchs are behind Hillary, and they push globalism to expand Jewish ethnic power, but they hire lunatics like Anne Killer of Forward to bitch and whine about how naked Trump is Hitler whose policy of banning Muslim immigration is Holocaust for Mexicans who apparently make good interfaith daughters for Jewish lesbians.
The world is a dangerous place because of Jewish Dominationism. It is the only Dominationism left in the world even though Jews keep projecting it onto other groups, especially Russians and Iranians(though at times at Chinese too).
Dominationism used to define much of the world until the end of WWII, though vestiges lasted until the end of the Cold War.
Several nations, mostly European, sought domination over the world. They didn’t necessarily want to rule the whole world but they either wanted to be #1 or one of the very great powers. The British were into dominationism, especially after they eclipsed the Spanish. The French were full of dominationism, especially under Napoleon who sought to control all of Europe and even invaded Russia.
Dominationism is about more than being dominant in one’s own nation or domain. It is a disproportionate ambition to gain control over a domain much larger than one’s homeland. Romans were dominationist. Japanese ruling over Japan was not dominationist, but Japanese designs on rest of Asia was dominationist.
In contrast, even though the Chinese practiced middle kingdom arrogance and regional dominance, they weren’t truly dominationist because they were content with control over their core domain.
In contrast, Spain was dominationist and so was Portugal. They tried to become the dominant powers in the world through navigation, trade, and colonization. But Brits and French overtook them, and they too went into dominationist mode. And they fought many wars, often with one another. And then later, Germans caught that bug. They too wanted to build a huge navy and grab imperial loot. And Russia began to conquer and dominate over non-Russian lands in Central Asia and Eastern Europe and even Scandinavia. These contentions led to Napoleonic Wars and finally World War I. And Japan caught the dominantionist bug in Asia, first taking small pieces but then savoring China and Southeast Asia.
No nation that would be a ‘great power’ was content with its own nation and borders. It had to control other territories, other nations, other kingdoms, other regions, the seas and skies. Japan wasn’t content with Japan. Germany wasn’t content with Germany. Italy wasn’t content with Italy. It too wanted to be great, a neo-roman empire with African territories. Brits and French ruled over vast empires. Germans and Japanese, both latecomers, wanted their piece of the pie. Japan invaded China, Germany invaded Russia in WWII. In WWI, the great power and would-be-great-powers beat the crap out of each other. The Ottomans, a once great power, clung to its fading empire by latching onto the Germans.
WWI dealt a huge blow to dominationism, but it didn’t die. France and Brits lost a lot of people and the war was costly, but they managed to hold onto their empires and still qualify as great powers. Japan expanded its position in Asia. Italy got to feeling big about itself, and it led to rise of Mussolini. Germany and Russia seemed like the two big losers, but communism armed Russia with new globalist purpose, and Germany turned to the most extreme form of dominationism with the rise of Nazism.
Back then, there were several dominationist contenders: Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Japan, Russia. The Turks were out as they wisely made peace with the loss of the Ottoman Empire, and they went about minding national issues.
But it wasn’t long before WWII cured all those nations of dominationism. Both winners and losers lost taste for it. Germany got defeated real bad, 100x worse than in WWI. Japan got demolished. France was humiliated in defeat at hands of Germans and had to be saved by detested Brits and Americans. Italy was exposed as a paper tiger power. Russia prevailed and even took over Eastern Europe, but the war was so costly and destructive that Russians were mostly involved with rebuilding. And its military was designed more for defense than offense contrary to US fears that USSR might swallow all of Europe. And the prospect of nuclear war tempered both US and USSR.
Europeans decided that the thing is to live with one another instead of seeking domination over one another. So many horrible wars had been fought among Europeans over domination, empire, and territory. Some of these wars were near-genocidal, like the Thirty Years War. But just as Catholics and Protestants finally decided to just respect one another and stop fighting one another, European peoples finally decided to bury the hatchet after WWII. No more hard feelings and vengeance. It’s like, at some point, Chrisendom and the Muslim world also decided to just leave each other alone and stop bashing one another.
Europeans were able to overcome dominationism because of the lessons of the war that was too horrifying. Also, as Jerry Muller wrote in Foreign Affairs, it was because the borderlines and population transfers after WWII produced very homogeneous nation-states. With each nation being made up mostly of its own kinfolk, there was less need for tension and conflict. (In contrast, Soviet Occupation of Eastern Bloc nations led to East German uprising, Polish riots, Hungarian uprising, and Czech uprisings; and the diverse crazy quilt of Yugoslavia led to the wars in the 90s.) The miracle of post WWII was that Europeans discovered they could live with one another in mutual peace and forgiveness as long as each people relinquished dominationism.
Europeans began to care more about goodness than greatness, cooperation than domination.
Even in the Soviet-occupied Eastern Bloc, there was relative peace since Soviets allowed each Warsaw Pact nation to mind its own affairs within its borders. It was empire by indirect rule. For so very long, Europeans had thought such peace was impossible. Each nation once had so many narratives and legends of their great heroes fighting the evil nasty bad guys of other nations. Each side felt so justified, even to the point of feeling bloodlust toward other peoples.
And Europeans once harbored such feelings toward Jews. The Jewish Question was asked over and over whether Christian folks can live with Jews. But after WWII, Europeans decided Jews are okay too. Everyone could get along as long as they all relinquished dominationism. After all, dominationism led to so many wars over the centuries that sometimes led to near-genocidal wars. So many people got ‘genocided’ in WWII. Not only Jews in holocaust but millions of dead Poles, Germans, Russians, etc. Who needed more of this? Even though WWII was more destructive than WWI, there was less bad blood after it than in the previous war. Paradoxically, the total-shit-facing just about every nation got taught it a most valuable lesson. Supremacism and chauvinism lead to mayhem and disaster for all. Therefore, much of the hatred that once seemed permanent among nations and ethnic groups melted away. Also, France and UK soon lost their empires and returned home. They made peace with the fact even though there were some hard-fought wars, especially in Vietnam and Algeria. Europeans learned to get along and do business with non-whites without dominationist empires.
And in the East, Japan lost its entire empire, renounced war, and decided to be a good nation and trading partner with the world. No more banzai imperial rising sun crap.
Americans could have been filled with dominationism as they were the undisputed great power after WWII, not least because its homeland was untouched by destruction. But America didn’t go into dominationist mode. Though it crushed Japan real bad, it was generous in helping to rebuild Japan and even felt a bit sorry for having dropped the two big ones. And instead of gloating as the dominant power, it came up with Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe and was ultimately magnanimous with Germany that soon rebuilt itself into the main economy of Europe.
And in the Cold War, US mostly played a defensive role to contain communism and spread of ‘world liberation movements’ allied with Soviets(who themselves didn’t know what to make of these movements). Even in Vietnam, US wasn’t trying to take north Vietnam but only trying to save the South from communism up north.
And US took weak measures against Castro’s Cuba. Maybe American elites felt some degree of guilt of having treated Cuba like a sleazy whore for too long. Even they could see that Castro and revolutionaries were inspired and popular whereas the most prominent Cuban exiles were gangsters, oligarchs, playboys, or stooges of the CIA.
Anyway, the 80s showed that Wasps, Russians, and Chinese were not into dominationism either. China under Deng wanted to change and just develop economically. Russians had enough of the Cold War. They wanted peace and were even willing to give up Eastern Bloc on promise that US would not seek dominationism by exploiting Russian weakness. And Reagan, upon sensing good will in Gorbachev, was eager to end the Cold War as soon as possible. With the end of the Cold War, it could really have been the end of dominationism all over the world.
But, there was one group that was not willing to give it up. The Jews.
This is rather odd. While it’s true that Jews did have problems with Europeans and Christians for a long time — just like French, Germans, Russians, Poles, Brits, Turks, Greeks, and etc had problems with one another, sometimes leading to horrible wars and retaliations — , Europeans and Christians really buried the hatchet with Jews after WWII, especially in Western Europe(though things got a bit hostile in Eastern Europe once Zionist Israel allied with the US). When Germans, French, Brits, Italians, and etc were all getting along with another — and despite the Iron Curtain, the relations between Western Europeans and Eastern Europeans were cordial on a personal/social basis — , Jews could have joined in like everyone else. After WWII and Holocaust, most Europeans lost the stomach for antisemitism, especially the overt kind, and new generation of kids were raised to tolerate and accept Jews. It was much the same in the US. So, Jews and whites could have gotten along famously after WWII. There was no more need for bad blood.
But Jews felt otherwise. Why?
Did Jews have dominationism on their minds from the outset? Or did they become addicted to it as they came into vast wealth, power, and influence? It seems like so much of Jewish vitriol against Trump and Putin has nothing to do with prospect of New Nazism. There is zero chance of gentiles rounding up Jews and doing horrible things. What Jews fear is the loss of their supremacist status, their dominationist control over others. At one time, maybe right after WWII, it is possible that Jews mainly had survival and well-being on their minds. But as they rapidly grew in power, privilege, and influence, they might have gotten accustomed to an existence that has meaning ONLY IF Jews are at the very top and bossing everyone around, even to the point of telling them not to use the word ‘bossy’.
Consider Putin. There are lots of rich Jews in Russia. Putin goes out of his way to accommodate the Jewish community. But that isn’t enough for Jews because Russian nationalism stands in the way of Jewish supremacist domination of the kind that defined 90s Russia.
And there is nothing in Trump’s platform that would do any harm to Jews. There are no anti-Jewish laws or anything. The only difference would be that a new civic nationalism would require Jews to be mindful of what is good for ALL Americans. Jews simply cannot abide by this. It’s either their way or.. it’s the Holocaust!! Anything other than Jewish dominationism and Jewish supremacism is the ‘Holocaust’ as Jews see it.
And this mindset is so deeply embedded in the sicko American political psyche(shaped by Jewish power) that we get strange statements about Israel and Palestinians. So, if anyone makes the slightest suggestion that Palestinians given some consideration in the West Bank, we have shrill hysteria(from both Democrats and Republicans, even from Trump) that this is ‘throwing Israel under the bus’, it is ‘new holocaust’, and etc. I mean Zionists have total domination over Palestinians who still live under occupation. Yet, even a modest proposal for some justice for Palestinians is seen as ‘new holocaust’ on the horizon for Jews. The most supremacist people bitch incessantly about how they are about to be destroyed by antisemitic supremacism when most critics of Zionism are only calling for a fair resolution to the West Bank crisis.
Jewish supremacists sound so much like the Nazis. Nazis sought supremacist control over other peoples, but they constantly bitched about how the poor poor Germans were being oppressed and done wrong by other peoples. In a way, even Nazi German complaint had more validity than the current Jewish hysteria. After all, Germans were treated badly in Sudetenland; and Stalin’s fate for Baltic Germans were pretty grim. But Jews are doing fine in America, EU, and Israel. If some Jews are periodically attacked in EU, it’s because of massive immigration of Muslims(with full support of Jewish globalists). And if there is some Palestinian violence against Israelis, well, the occupation is still going on, and Israelis keep building more settlements.
Holocaust Cult has blinded Jews to the idea that they could become evil and supremacist themselves. They are so used to seeing themselves as victims of Nazi racial supremacism that they are blind to their own abuse of power and overly sensitive to any criticism of Jewish power.
And spectacular Jewish success in so many fields have accustomed Jews to the mindset that Jews are entitled to lead super-privileged lives with complete obedience from the gentile population. Jews have become so spoiled in the US and EU — where Holocaust Cult is a religion — that they expect the same kind of treatment all over the world and get awful angry when they don’t get it. So, they use the might of US and NATO to smash any gentile nation they don’t like, mostly in Middle East, North Africa, and Eastern Europe as Russia is in the crosshairs.
The tragedy of WWII led to one great moral triumph for most peoples: the abandonment of dominationism and willingness to respect other nations and get along in peace and mutual respect. Just a decade after WWII, it was amazing how the Europeans were getting along and cooperating. One might think the greatest war in history never happened. They were willing to bury the hatchet,and this goodwill was extended to Jews as well.
But Jews, due to Holocaust neurosis, radical personality, newfound arrogance of great success, or whatever, decided to work in bad faith and serve their own dominationism. And American Jews dragged Anglo-cucks into this madness, and we have whores like Hillary and John McCain barking at Russia. We have a useless ‘new cold war’ that makes no sense apart from Jewish ethno-supremacism. We have these horrible wars in the Middle East and North Africa that were concocted by Zionist-globalists. And with the massive migration of ‘refugees’ and migrants from Africa and Muslim world to Europe, national borders are in tatters.
The great achievement of end of WWII was the clear demarcation of national borders and the creation of homogeneous populations. But Jews have this crazy idea that homogeneous gentile nations means new rise of Nazism, and so, Jews support open borders and diversity so that gentiles will be forever in conflict with other gentiles.
And so, the world is going to pot once again. The golden opportunity was lost.
And who knows? If things get so horribly bad in Europe, maybe there will be the rise of new extreme antisemitism once again.